X

NV5 Geospatial Blog

Each month, NV5 Geospatial posts new blog content across a variety of categories. Browse our latest posts below to learn about important geospatial information or use the search bar to find a specific topic or author. Stay informed of the latest blog posts, events, and technologies by joining our email list!



Easily Share Workflows With the Analytics Repository

Easily Share Workflows With the Analytics Repository

10/27/2025

With the recent release of ENVI® 6.2 and the Analytics Repository, it’s now easier than ever to create and share image processing workflows across your organization. With that in mind, we wrote this blog to: Introduce the Analytics Repository Describe how you can use ENVI’s interactive workflows to... Read More >

Deploy, Share, Repeat: AI Meets the Analytics Repository

Deploy, Share, Repeat: AI Meets the Analytics Repository

10/13/2025

The upcoming release of ENVI® Deep Learning 4.0 makes it easier than ever to import, deploy, and share AI models, including industry-standard ONNX models, using the integrated Analytics Repository. Whether you're building deep learning models in PyTorch, TensorFlow, or using ENVI’s native model creation tools, ENVI... Read More >

Blazing a trail: SaraniaSat-led Team Shapes the Future of Space-Based Analytics

Blazing a trail: SaraniaSat-led Team Shapes the Future of Space-Based Analytics

10/13/2025

On July 24, 2025, a unique international partnership of SaraniaSat, NV5 Geospatial Software, BruhnBruhn Innovation (BBI), Netnod, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) achieved something unprecedented: a true demonstration of cloud-native computing onboard the International Space Station (ISS) (Fig. 1). Figure 1. Hewlett... Read More >

NV5 at ESA’s Living Planet Symposium 2025

NV5 at ESA’s Living Planet Symposium 2025

9/16/2025

We recently presented three cutting-edge research posters at the ESA Living Planet Symposium 2025 in Vienna, showcasing how NV5 technology and the ENVI® Ecosystem support innovation across ocean monitoring, mineral exploration, and disaster management. Explore each topic below and access the full posters to learn... Read More >

Monitor, Measure & Mitigate: Integrated Solutions for Geohazard Risk

Monitor, Measure & Mitigate: Integrated Solutions for Geohazard Risk

9/8/2025

Geohazards such as slope instability, erosion, settlement, or seepage pose ongoing risks to critical infrastructure. Roads, railways, pipelines, and utility corridors are especially vulnerable to these natural and human-influenced processes, which can evolve silently until sudden failure occurs. Traditional ground surveys provide only periodic... Read More >

1345678910Last
«November 2025»
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2627282930311
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30123456
10131 Rate this article:
5.0

GIS in the Rockies 2015: Presentation Preview

Anonym

I was really excited to learn recently that an abstract I submitted to GIS in the Rockies 2015 was accepted. So for today's blog I decided to give a sneak preview of the abstract titled "Today’s Vision: Tomorrow’s Reality".

Over the years, I’ve developed some extensive proof of concept workflows for customers, and some of the most intensive work has been around generating accuracy assessments of ground survey vs. airborne LiDAR to help determine if augmenting, or even in some cases substituting, an airborne survey is accurate enough to meet project requirements. These projects seem to be driven by the prospect of saving time. But the goal of time saved is not only to retain profit. It is also driven by the possibility of safety improvements and even in some cases accuracy improvement!

So what we’re going to look at is the surface that’s generated from the points in two different ways. First, we’ll take a look at the vertical comparison, and to do that we’ll compare survey acquired ground control points (GCPs) and the LiDAR-derived surface generated from the image overlap. From this process we can compute the error and we end up with a quantifiable method to assess the airborne survey vertical accuracy.

The second thing we’ll look at are the contour lines that are generated from the survey and comparing them to contour lines generated from the point cloud analysis. This will give us a good idea of qualitative horizontal accuracy. These metrics can be useful to determine if the airborne accuracy meets project specifications.

In my presentation I will be sure to discuss geoid correction, re-projecting the point cloud to the survey projection, and methods for volumetric analysis. I hope to see you September 23-24 in Denver for GIS in the Rockies!

Please login or register to post comments.