X
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 16 Mar 2013 10:25 AM by  anon
FLAASH problems with ASTER L1B data
 3 Replies
Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages

anon



New Member


Posts:
New Member


--
16 Mar 2013 10:25 AM
    Hi my dear friends, I tried many times to use FLAASH atmospheric correction on ASTER L1B radiance at sensor imagery data, I followed ENVI 4.8 tutorial step by tep: 1- Opening hdf file, rotate the scene to North, layerstacking VNIR and SWIR bands, change the layers interleave from BSQ to BIL; all data are in floatpoint format. 2- launching FLAASH and input the layer stack, output, output directrory and root name. 3- Other parameters are as follow: Scene Center (26.576913, 33.522527), Sensor type (ASTER), Sensor Altitude (705), Ground elevation (0.5 km),Pixel size (30m), Flight date (Oct,07,2007), Flight time (08:36:11), Atmospheric model (Tropical), Aerosol model (no aerosol), Aerosol retreival (none), Initial visibility (40 km), Water column multiplier (1) I got the following strange result: Basic Stats Min Max Mean Stdev Band 1 10022 31733 21659.327332 3112.752079 Band 2 -32768 32767 18565.863712 17028.841048 Band 3 -32768 32767 9294.338018 25513.794746 Band 4 -32768 32767 -3449.131618 27240.437507 Band 5 -32538 32657 6901.990400 27670.827593 Band 6 -32575 32637 8210.694485 26659.883219 Band 7 -32504 32684 5053.513011 27116.821587 Band 8 -32533 32640 3907.706868 26745.511909 Band 9 -32492 32456 -19378.138755 11149.961307 I hope you can help me in my target: converting ASTER L1B radiance at sensor to surface reflectance data (with values ranging between 0 to All my kind regards to all

    Deleted User



    New Member


    Posts:
    New Member


    --
    17 Mar 2013 07:33 AM
    Scale factor for all bands 1 or 10?

    Deleted User



    New Member


    Posts:
    New Member


    --
    17 Mar 2013 04:48 PM
    It was 1 . But I proposed taking single scale factor for all bands = 10 Sinsor: ASTER; Date: Oct-7-2007; Time: 8:36:11; Pixel size: 30m; Scene Center: 26.412375N, 33.41476389E; Ground elevation: 0.5 km; Atmospheric Model: Mid latitude winter; Aerosol Model: Tropospheric; Aerosol Retrieval: None; Initial Visibility: 40 km; Using adjacent corection: yes; Output Reflectance scale Factor: 10000 ; the results are as following: Basic Stats Min Max Mean Stdev Band 1 -1241 4097 2107.838860 576.344895 Band 2 0 5220 2551.291191 757.570964 Band 3 -511 5808 3074.867771 878.657555 Band 4 -77 5707 3468.389284 887.285919 Band 5 -28 4974 3153.869348 731.540298 Band 6 -25 4991 3066.222774 744.248962 Band 7 -23 5243 3154.268821 815.933603 Band 8 -23 5767 3327.558536 901.861261 Band 9 -32 8426 5231.177205 1243.998060 As you see, it still giving negative minimums and abnormal maximums!!!! I can not find the reason, and I will be very appreciated to you for helping me. All my best regards

    Deleted User



    New Member


    Posts:
    New Member


    --
    18 Mar 2013 01:46 AM
    Atmospheric Model:Mid latitude winter, maybe better use Tropical? About negative value - http://www.exelisvis.com/...921/scope/posts.aspx For conversion FLAASH results to reflection values (0-1) without negative values you can use simple expression for Band Math (b1 le 0)*0+(b1 ge 10000)*1+(b1 gt 0 and b1 lt 10000)*float(b1)/10000
    You are not authorized to post a reply.