X
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 31 Aug 2014 09:57 PM by  anon
Using SPEAR relative water dpeth wizard with DN
 1 Replies
Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages

anon



New Member


Posts:
New Member


--
31 Aug 2014 09:57 PM
    Could anyone give me the heads up on why I might be getting better results using Landsat 5 DN files than radiometrically and atmospherically corrected Landsat files. The example of the tool use by David Huslander ( A quantitative comparison of Traditional and image derived bathymetry...") includes this preprocessing before running the tool. However when I run the tool with preprocessed files the results show no sensitivity to depth, while just including raw DN files produces a much better result. Thanks if anyone can give me any advice. Annette

    Deleted User



    Basic Member


    Posts:228
    Basic Member


    --
    03 Sep 2014 12:49 PM
    The documentation for the SPEAR Relative Water Depth tool actually states: "For calculating relative water depths, it is typically best to not perform atmospheric correction. Atmospheric correction of littoral or marine areas often alters the data such that calculating water depths may produce anomalous and unsatisfactory results. Unless there is a specific need to perform atmospheric correction and the implications are understood, it is best to skip this step." So, you are right, it is expected that you would get better results when skipping the preprocessing. Peg Exelis VIS
    You are not authorized to post a reply.