X

NV5 Geospatial Blog

Each month, NV5 Geospatial posts new blog content across a variety of categories. Browse our latest posts below to learn about important geospatial information or use the search bar to find a specific topic or author. Stay informed of the latest blog posts, events, and technologies by joining our email list!



NV5 at ESA’s Living Planet Symposium 2025

NV5 at ESA’s Living Planet Symposium 2025

9/16/2025

We recently presented three cutting-edge research posters at the ESA Living Planet Symposium 2025 in Vienna, showcasing how NV5 technology and the ENVI® Ecosystem support innovation across ocean monitoring, mineral exploration, and disaster management. Explore each topic below and access the full posters to learn... Read More >

Monitor, Measure & Mitigate: Integrated Solutions for Geohazard Risk

Monitor, Measure & Mitigate: Integrated Solutions for Geohazard Risk

9/8/2025

Geohazards such as slope instability, erosion, settlement, or seepage pose ongoing risks to critical infrastructure. Roads, railways, pipelines, and utility corridors are especially vulnerable to these natural and human-influenced processes, which can evolve silently until sudden failure occurs. Traditional ground surveys provide only periodic... Read More >

Geo Sessions 2025: Geospatial Vision Beyond the Map

Geo Sessions 2025: Geospatial Vision Beyond the Map

8/5/2025

Lidar, SAR, and Spectral: Geospatial Innovation on the Horizon Last year, Geo Sessions brought together over 5,300 registrants from 159 countries, with attendees representing education, government agencies, consulting, and top geospatial companies like Esri, NOAA, Airbus, Planet, and USGS. At this year's Geo Sessions, NV5 is... Read More >

Not All Supernovae Are Created Equal: Rethinking the Universe’s Measuring Tools

Not All Supernovae Are Created Equal: Rethinking the Universe’s Measuring Tools

6/3/2025

Rethinking the Reliability of Type 1a Supernovae   How do astronomers measure the universe? It all starts with distance. From gauging the size of a galaxy to calculating how fast the universe is expanding, measuring cosmic distances is essential to understanding everything in the sky. For nearby stars, astronomers use... Read More >

Using LLMs To Research Remote Sensing Software: Helpful, but Incomplete

Using LLMs To Research Remote Sensing Software: Helpful, but Incomplete

5/26/2025

Whether you’re new to remote sensing or a seasoned expert, there is no doubt that large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI’s ChatGPT or Google’s Gemini can be incredibly useful in many aspects of research. From exploring the electromagnetic spectrum to creating object detection models using the latest deep learning... Read More >

1345678910Last
«September 2025»
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
31123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829301234
567891011
15199 Rate this article:
5.0

What the *bleep* is IDL doing: COMPILE_OPT

Anonym

If you are a modern IDL programmer, the line compile_opt idl2 is at the top of every function/procedure/method/$MAIN program you write.  If it's not, I'm here to convince you it should be. 

First off, what exactly is a compile_opt. A compile_opt is a statement which is processed by the IDL compiler to change the behavior of the compiler.  It is processed in order of the statements (meaning if you put a compile_opt in the middle of your code, it's effect would only apply to code after the compile_opt).

What does compile_opt idl2 do?  The idl2 flag sets two flags for the IDL compiler, DEFINT32 and STRICTARRDEFINT32 sets the default size of IDL integers to be 32-bits rather than 16-bits.  This is useful because it aligns the default behavior of IDL with the standard size of a C language long, so you can rely on the more liberal -2147483648 and 2147483647 underflow/overflow values of type longSTRICTARR  prevents IDL from using parenthesis for array indexing.

Why is this important?  Consider the following:

       offset = input(0)

       data = input[100] * offset

What is input?  One of the difficulties of untyped languages is the ability to discern the intent of code from a small context.  In this case, input could either be: a function and an array, or an array which is being accessed two different ways (valid syntax without compile_opt idl2).  By always putting compile_opt idl2 at the beginning of every function, this ambiguity is removed.

You might be thinking to yourself, "But I like indexing array's with parenthesis, I'll just stick compile_opt idl2 in any new code I write".  In the words of a once great robot, "DANGER! DANGER, WILL ROBINSON!"  Consider the following:

test22.pro

PRO test22

  resolve_routine, 'a', /either,/compile_full_file

 

  print, 'Answer = ', b('stuff')

 

END

----

a.pro

FUNCTION b, istuff

  COMPILE_OPT idl2, hidden

 

  RETURN, 'b'

END

 

 

FUNCTION a, istuff

  COMPILE_OPT idl2

 

  RETURN, 'a'

END

If you try to run test22, the function b will not be resolved.  This is because the symbols for test22.pro are generated before the resolve_routine and since there is no reference to b it will be treated as a variable.  After the resolve_routine, the compiler will not override the variable type of b for the function.  This problem will also present itself if you sick compile_opt idl2 in the middle of your code.  When IDL gets confused, you lose.

Here are some simple tricks to follow to avoid these pitfalls:

  1. Always put compile_opt idl2 at the top of your function/procedure.
  2. If your function doesn't have compile_opt idl2, add it!  Worse case, you have to refactor array parenthesis to brackets.  But this simple refactor will reduce headaches down the road by making your code more readable and extensible.
  3. If you are working in legacy code (and insist it remain legacy code), be aware if external code is using compile_opt idl2. If it is, double check your function/procedure/variable names to prevent IDL from getting confused.
Please login or register to post comments.